Search for: "Sellers v. Jacobs"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
Jacob v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:04 pm
Jacob, Real Estate Group [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
Jacobs, 2012 Wisc. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
Jacob, Real Estate Group [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 1:06 am
In this post, Jacob Gilkes, a member of the tax team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Balhousie Holdings Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, which concerns whether a sale and leaseback transaction should be regarded for VAT purposes as a disposal by the seller of its “entire interest” in the building. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., et al., 82 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 1996) (applying Hawaii law); Jacobs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
” The court determined that Jacobs does not apply in this case.In Jacobs, the court stated, the defendant was an out-of-state agent acting on behalf of Oregon residents who were the sellers of the investment. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:00 pm
Cir. 2014) Virnetx v Cisco opinion. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
Stein, January 25, 2021, Jacobs, D.).Bermudan companies. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am
Jacobs has his own preview at Greenwire, noting that the case “could have broad ramifications for federal employees. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
It was not just to prevent other sellers from using similar names (e.g. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:17 am
CooperComcast Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:17 am
CooperComcast Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
Newbie Summer Reading: How Lamie Newbie Summer Reading: Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Further, in US v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:02 am
Derby, Touro College Jacob D. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
Jacob Jacoby of NYU is one of the FTC’s experts. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Jacobs, 117 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1997) (holding that intent to harm is, in fact, an element of the offense); United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
UK courts would also be in a better position to move away from unpopular CJEU decisions: the panel pointed to L’Oreal v Bellure (C-487/07) as a good example of this (in which many, including Sir Robin Jacob, criticised the CJEU for finding that “smell-alike” perfumes can infringe trade marks, even in a situation where the seller tells the buyer that the perfume is a smell-alike) (see hereand here) [But what will be the relevance of CJEU judgments issued… [read post]
